LIBRARY OF ST SOPHIA & JOHN OF WISDOM III - JUDGEMENTS & NOTES - SUBJECT ORDER - PRESENTATION 5

THE ROYAL CHILDREN OF SAINT SOPHIA AND SAINT JOHN OF WISDOM III
Home
_________
HITS FOR THIS SITE
FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT OUR LIBRARIES
GUEST BOOK - GREETINGS TO THE KNOWN UNIVERSES - SOPHIA OF WISDOM III
___________
GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA
__________
THE MOTHER AND THE FATHER - THE DIVINE COUPLE - FORCES OF LIFE
THE DORIA FAMILY - HEADS OF STATE
THE HISTORY OF THE GOD OF ALL GODS AND OF THE CRIVELLI
__________
THE ROYAL CHILDREN OF SAINT SOPHIA AND SAINT JOHN OF WISDOM III
JOHAN MARC VANDERMEER KENNEDY
CLAYTON ALEXANDER MCRORY KENNEDY
AVA LEAH MCRORY KENNEDY
_________
POPE URBAN III - UBERTO OF THE MILANESE FAMILY OF CRIVELLI - ULLIMINATI
CRIVELLI ITALIAN SALSA PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL - THE HOLY GRAIL OF SALSAS
BAT - KOL - KENNEDY 2008
_________
THE PRESENT AND FUTURE POLICIES
CRIVELLUCCI AND LORDS OF KARMA COUNSEL
_________
CRIVELLUCCI AND LORD OF KARMA COUNSEL - CERFITICATES
CRIVELLUCCI AND THE LORDS OF KARMA COUNSEL - REWARDS
ANTI - CHRIST REPORTS OF THE MOTHER'S OF DARKNESS
TO ALL HEADS OF STATE
PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES - FAMILY HISTORY

 WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OF LIFE - ORUMS

OF WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OF LIFE - ORUMS

 

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OF LIFE - ORUMS

Like Isis in Egypt, Inanna and Ishtar of Mesopotamia, and Asherah in Canaan, women of high birth were actually encouraged to seek out and have

children by multiple partners -

with or

 without the covering of marriage.

In the

EGYPT OF REHAB,

a leading 

QUEEN

was designated as the

“GOD'S WIFE.”

 She could have numerous children

(“HOLY BIRTHS”)

by various kings

(“GODS”)

and still be considered

A PEPETUALVIRGIN.

Outside the context of the royal court however, these ladies would have been thought of as no better than whores, and the Biblical authors often found it a convenient artifice to model them as such.

***NOTES OF SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THIS WAS AN UNFAIR LAW AND THEY USED ON ME... THIS IS WHY IT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN WHO

THE

FATHER

OF

 MY

ROYAL CHILDREN

 

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III THE SEEDS OF LIFE

CAROLINE E. KENNEDY

 

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III THE SEEDS OF LIFE

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OFLIFE - ORMUS

 
 

 

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III THE SEEDS OF LIFE

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III

THE MADONNA ON THE ROCKS 

DA VINCI CODE

 
THE MADONNA ON THE ROCKS
 PAINTING
AQUILEGA
OR
 COLUMBINE (DOVE PLANT) ARE BESIDE
THE VIRGIN'S FACE
THESE SYMBOLISE
THE HOLY SPIRIT...

THE HISTORY OF THE CRIVELLI
 
THE MEROVEIGOVAN

HOW A CHILD CAN HAD 2 TO 3 FATHER'S AT THE SAME TIME...
History: Magdalen Grail Line,

Sitting there last night watching the detailed BBC special on Isreal's Nuclear Coverup (ref 1, ref 2) - brought home again the ancient wisdom that those who ignore the lessons of history are condemned to repeat them.

THE CRO MAGMAN THEORY

SEE LINK

****THIS MEANS THAT THEY ARE NOT THE DIVINE COUPLE
AND THEY ARE THE SAME SEX   AND THEY MAKE AN IMPLOSION IN THE SHELL OF THE SPERM...
SEE LINK
http://libraryofstsophiastjohn.tripod.com/id173.html
 

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - CAOLINE E. KENNEDY - CAROLINA KENNEDIA

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OF LIFE

IN THE
 ILLUMINATI
 
PRINCESS DIANA
POSED AS
LUCIZIA CRIVELLI - VISCONTI - SFORZA
WHO WAS THE MADONNA
IN THE PAINTING OF LEONARDO DA VINCI
THE MADONNA ON THE ROCKS
 
LUCIZIA CRIVELLI - VISCONTI - SFORZA
WAS
THE AUNT-IN-LAW
OF
PRINCESS ISABELLA
AKA
MONA LISA
 
LUCIZIA CRIVELLI - VISCONTI - SFORZA
IS ALSO
THE SISTER OF
CARLO CRIVELLI - MASTER PAINTER
HIS PAINTING IS USED FOR THE
LOGO
OF
CRIVELLI ITALIAN SALSA PROUCTS INTERNATIONAL
 
PRINCESS DIANA WAS PULLING
 EGGS
OR
THE SEEDS OF LIFE
OUT OF
 MONA LISA
AKA
PRINCESS ISABELLA

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OF LIFE - ORUMS
 

THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE WHEN THEY PULL OUT
THE SEEDS OF LIFE
OUT OF ME
WHICH ARE RADIOACTIVE
 
THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKED LIKE WHEN THEY DID IT TO
MONA LISA
BACK THEN
AND
IN
 DEC 2003

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THE HISTORY OF THE GOD OF ALL GODS

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - OF THE CRIVELLI 00

 
THE HISTORY
OF
THE GOD OF ALL GODS
&
THE NOBLE MILANESE FAMILY
OF THE CRIVELLI
 
MARY MAGDALENE
 
SUMMARY
 
THERE IS A GREAT DEBATE OVER WHO
CAROLYN BESSETTE IS IN RELATION
TO
MARY MAGADELENE
VS
CAROLINE E. KENNEDY - CAROLINA KENNEDIA
ISIS OF 10, 000 NAMES
AND
MARY MAGDALENE IS ONE OF THEM
 
CAROLYN BESSETTE IS A JUMPER
(A TIME TRAVELER)
SHE KNEW WHO
JOHN F. KENNEDY, JR.
 AND
I
CAROLINE E. KENNEDY - CAROLINA KENNEDIA
 WAS WELL IN ADAVANCE ....
 
HOW I KNOW SHE PREPLANNED HER MARRIAGE TO ST. JOHN OF WISDOM III
AKA
JOHN F. KENNEDY, JR.
SHE - HER MOTHER AND SISTERS MOVED FROM WHERE THEY BORN AFTER HER PARENTS DIVORCE TO
 NEW CANNAN
NEW YORK
CLOSE TO WHERE
 MOTHER ANN LEE
ONCE LIVED
 IN
NEW LEBNEON
HER FATHER
WAS NOT A PROFESSION OF THAT OF
A
DAUGHTER GOD
AND
HER STEP FATHER'S NAME FREEMAN IS ON  
THE ILLUMINATI LIST
OF
 FAMILY NAMES
 BUT
HE DID NOT ADOPT HER...
SO
HER ONLY ONLY WAY TO GET ON TO THE LIST IS TO MARRY SOMEONE WHO IS ON THE LIST
JOHN F. KENNEDY, JR.
WAS
THEIR HONEYMOON A TELL TALE SIGN OF WHO SHE WAS OR WAS NOT...
 
MARRIED ON THE ESTATE
OF
ANDREW CARNGIE
HE BUILT
 LIBRARIES
IN PLACES WHERE
CAROLINE E. KENNEDY - CAROLINA KENNEDIA
LIVED
ALAMEDA AND DIXON
CALIFORNIA
 
HONEYMOONED
IN TURKEY
HAGIA SOPHIA
PLACE OF WORSHIP
FOR
MARY MAGDALENE
SAILED
THE AEGEAN SEA
REFERS TO
EUROPA AND THE SEA BULL
 
EUPHEUS
HOME OF
VIRGIN MARY
AND
MANY OTHER GODDESS'S
WAS
JOHN F. KENNEDY, JR.
TRYING TO ANNOUNCE HER AS
SOPHIA OF WISDOM
MARY MAGDALENE
OR BURN HER?
 
THE NEW YORK TIMES
CLAIMS THAT THE MARRIAGE LICENSE WAS NEVER FILED AND THIS MEANS THE MARRIAGE TOOK PLACE
SEP 23, 2006
 
THE FIRST STORY ABOUT MARY MAGADLENE IS CONFUSSING AND I BELIEVE THEY WENT THERE SO THEY COULD WORK UP A BETTER STORY BEFORE
THE  BOZRAH DELIVERENCE
APR 11, 2003
 
SO THIS IS MY PROOF THAT THEY KEEP STEALING MY INFORMATION SO THEY CAN MAKE A BETTER CLAIM THAN ME...
________________________
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
"Great Supreme Woman"
of her tribe: Benjamin
WHO WAS MARY MAGDALENE?
 
 
Europa and the Sea Bull:
The Missing Link Between Phoenicia and France
A
MARY MAGDALENE
LINE
OF
CHILDREN
OF
THE MEROVINGIAN KINGS
FROM
THE AEGEAN SEA
PHOENICIA - QUINOTAUR
A DAUGTHER OF GOD
 
_____________________

 
"Great Supreme Woman"
of her
tribe: 
Benjamin
WHO WAS MARY MAGDALENE?
 
At the Crucifixion and Resurrection, there is a mysterious woman who
is present, named Mary Magdalene. 
 
*****THIS WAS ME SOPHIA OF WISDOM III THIS SOUL MATE FROM THE BEGINNING OF TIME...
 
 OF WISDOM III - PICS - SOUL MATES
Some say she was the wife of Jesus.
SOPHA OF WISDOM III - PICS - DIVINE COUPLE
 
Others say she was a prostitute freed by Jesus. 
 
Still others say she
was an esoteric figure of a secret royal line in France.
 
***CAROLYN BESSETTE DID HAVE A PRINCESS IN HER FAMILY THE TITLE DIED OUT A LONG TIME AGO.
 
Just who was this mysterious figure?
 
***CAROLYN BESSETTE & JFK,JR. JUMPING BACK IN TIME  SO HE COULD RECORD DOCUMENTS OF EVENTS...
 
 
****CAROLYN BESSETTE IS THE THREE ON THE STAIR WAY #2
SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OF LIFE

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OF LIFE

The Biblical evidence identifies a woman who anoints Jesus with an alabaster box at the house of a Pharisee named Simon as
 "a woman of the city who was a sinner."[Lk 7:37] 
 
Jesus then forgives her all her sins, which sins He says, "are many." 
 
*****THIS WAS CAROLYN BESSETTE
 
In the very next section, we are told that Mary Magdalene,
 
"out of whom He had cast seven demons,"
 
***CAROLYN BESSETTE HAD SEVEAL OTHER DEMON SPIRITS IN HER AND THEY SPELLED HIM TO PULL ONE AY TIME OUT AND HAVE SEX WITH THEM...
 
AND THESE ARE THEIR JUMPERS BOOTS...THIS HOW THEY JUMP IN TIME...

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OF LIFE

had begun following Jesus and the Apostles
[Lk 8:2]. 

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OF LIFE

Jesus says that because the
woman had been forgiven much, she loved Him much
 [Lk 7:47].
 
***THIS WAS NINA ALVES THE WHORE SEE #6...
 
Many have assumed this woman is Mary Magdalene and that she was some sort of prostitute because "woman of the city"
 
****THIS WAS CAROLYN BESSETTE AND SEVERAL OTHERS...AND I SOPHIA OF WISDOM III WAS NOT ON THIS ORMUS SEX TRIP...
 
could have that meaning in some situations. 
 
The text does not explicitly identify the woman as
Mary Magdalene or as a prostitute, however.  Luke does say Mary had had seven demons cast out of her and responded by following Jesus. 
 
It must have been clear to Luke as he wrote that the strong similarity between these two women and their juxtaposition
 
***THIS MEANS THE MAN HAD A PENIS ON HIS HEAD AND THE WOMAN HAD A VIRGINA ON HER HEAD AND THEY HAD SEX...
 
in immediate succession would
lead many to identify the two as the same person. 
 
***THIS MEANS LISA TOMMASO & LISA GONZALES ARE WALKINS AND CAN SHARE THE SAME BODY... 
 
The gospels often go
to some pains to avoid such confusion, for example, when John speaks of "Judas" at the Last Supper and adds, "not the Iscariot." 
 
***THAT HE WAS NOT THE RIGHT PERSON FOR THIS CASE...
 
So by failing to clarify that Mary Magdalene is not the same woman, Luke in effect is
allowing us to make that identification.
 
This, if correct, would lead us to a second conclusion very rapidly,
for the anointing of Jesus is REQUIRED by an express command of Jesus
to be recorded whenever the gospel is preached [Mt 26:13].  Therefore, because the ONLY anointing Luke records is the one by that "woman of the city," we must conclude that this is the same anointing as we see
recorded in the other gospels.  Note what the other accounts add:
 
The anointing is in the house of Simon THE LEPER of BETHANY and the box contained "VERY PRECIOUS" ointment [Mt 26:6-13]. 
 
This anointing of Jesus is followed WITHOUT A BREAK by Judas betraying Jesus, implying a
direct link between the anointing and Judas' decision [Mt 26:14-15].
Mark adds the fact that this ointment in Simon's house was of a very precious substance called "SPIKENARD"--but someone complains, "Why was
this WASTE of the ointment made? 
 
****BECAUSE JESUS/JFK,JR. WAS A FLAVUS NOT A KING OR GOD....A MYSTICAL BEING THAT WHEN MARY MAGDALENE HIS SOUL MATE FROM THE BEGINNING OF TIME WOULD MAKE A COMMANDMENT HE WOULD MYSTICALLY WOULD GO AND  DO THE ORDER AND COME BACK MISSION COMPLETE... SO WHEN THE OTHER MARY OR CAROLYN BESSETTE POURED THE SPIKNARD ALL OVER JESUS/JFK,JR. HE WAS MARKED FOR DEATH BECAUSE HE WAS HIGHER THAN A KING OR GOD AND NOW MARY MAGDALENE DIDN'T HAVE  HER FLAVUS...
 

1ST SON

 
For it might have been SOLD FOR MORE
THAN 300 PENCE."[Mk 14:3-5]  That equals a YEAR'S WAGES in those days,
or roughly $20,000 in modern terms. 
 
Obviously, this was a black-market ointment, something ILLEGAL, such as oil used to anoint someone KING.
 
John, at last, completes the story:  The woman who anoints Jesus is none other than Mary of Bethany, the SISTER OF MARTHA AND LAZARUS. 
 
 So the woman was named MARY after all.  And because she and her sister are
supposed to serve guests in this house, a house we can now identify as the house of Simon the Pharisee, a "leper" (which some say was a coded
way of identifying a person who advocated independence from Rome, and
who was ostracized like a leper on the Sanhedrin), we must see Simon as the FATHER of Mary, Martha and Lazarus.
 
Now it becomes clear why these three siblings are living in the same house; it is the family estate. 
 
We know that Lazarus is wealthy when we are told of the huge crowds that gather when Jesus raises Lazarus from the dead. 
 
Bethany was on the eastern slope of the Mount of Olives
--prime real estate.  Yet Lazarus' family owns a large enough estate to have this huge throng there ("the WHOLE WORLD has gone after Him"), and A private tomb on the property of a PHARISEE who would want to maintain
ritual purity by keeeping his house as far from a tomb as possible.
 
Simon is a wealthy Pharisee living on choice property near Jerusalem with a house big enough to sleep several adult men and women. 
 
It is his daughter who anoints Jesus with contraband royal ointment in his
presence at a dinner in honor of his son Lazarus.
This explains why a Pharisee would allow a "woman of the city who
was a sinner" into his house and let her POUR HER OINTMENT ALL OVER JESUS AND ONTO HIS FLOOR. 
 
Pharisees would NEVER permit a STRANGER to enter their home who might be "unclean" and pour oil of UNKNOWN origin
onto their floor. 
 
 (She wipes the oil on Jesus' feet also.)  For the ritually pure Pharisees this was anathema. 
 
But if this is his very
own daughter, a woman he knew, and if he knew exactly where that oil
had come from, then the mystery vanishes.
THE ANOINTING OIL
 So where did that oil come from?
The term "SPIKE-nard" is very misleading.  The Greek actually calls
it "GENUINE nard"--which the translators change to "SPIKE-nard" on the
assumption that some copyist made a mistake.  But the correct reading
of "GENUINE" has awesome implications.  It signifies that this was the
GENUINE anointing oil.  In other words, THE GENUINE royal anointing oil of the priests and kings. 
 
The oil of KING DAVID.  Of the MESSIAH, the ANOINTED One.
 No wonder Jesus insisted they include this story in every telling of the gospel.  This was His official anointing as Priest and King.
 
[The ancient origin of this alabaster box of oil is detailed in an extensive audio/printed report called "THE SECRETS OF PETRA."  It is far too much to cover on the web.  Copies can be ordered via our NEWS & UPDATES page.]
 
But could a fallen woman anoint Jesus Priest and King?
 
MARY "THE MAGDALENE" AND HER FATHER NICODEMUS
Mary and Martha are grown women living in their father's house on a
large estate. 
 
This is most unusual.  Ordinarily the only way a woman
would return to her father's house was by being widowed or divorced or
if her husband had gone on a long journey and left her otherwise alone.
 
The Talmud has a curious story about a man named Nicodemus.  It says
he was one of the richest men in Jewish history.  This Nicodemus had two
daughters named Mary and Martha:  Martha was a widow who returned to her
father Nicodemus' house, while Mary had married an extremely rich man
and had brought him a huge dowry.  The Talmud does not say why Mary was
living at home, but we may assume her husband travelled a great deal.
The Talmud places this story 30 years AFTER the Biblical Nicodemus--
a generation later.  Tradition says that Nicodemus and his whole family
were ARRESTED because of their Christianity.   All were exiled to Gaul
by 37 AD, except Nicodemus, who is said to have seen them sail off from
Caesarea.  Yet the Talmud seems to place the family a generation later.
But according to Psalm 109, people convicted of capital crimes--and
the book of Acts says that professing Christianity had become a capital
crime--had their NAMES BLOTTED OUT "unto the second generation."  So it
was FORBIDDEN for the rabbis to publicly discuss or write about someone who had been blotted out, as Nicodemus and his family had been. 
 
 By the shifting of the "time" of the Talmudic stories 30 years later, rabbis
could write about blotted-out events during the "forbidden" period. 
 
We have many Talmudic stories about Jesus, Lazarus and other blotted-out New Testament figures, which also exhibit a similar time-shift.
 

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OF LIFE

 
It appears, therefore, that the Talmud has coyly "resurrected" some
forbidden history of the family of Nicodemus and Mary Magdalene, which
shows she was married to one of the richest men in her world.  Who could
that be?
 
MARY AND JOSEPH, THE "OTHER HOLY FAMILY"...
The term "Nicodemus" means "innocent of blood" and is hardly a name
one receives at birth.  So "Simon" might well be his given name.  When
Jesus is condemned by the Sanhedrin, the vote has to be UNANIMOUS. 
 
****THIS MEANS THAT THEY ARE NOT THE DIVINE COUPLE
AND THEY ARE THE SAME SEX   AND THEY MAKE AN IMPLOSION IN THE SHELL OF THE SPERM...
Yet we know that two members, Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus do not feel
Jesus is guilty.  This can only mean that Caiaphas the High Priest held
their proxies and cast their votes for them.
The Talmud and other sources reveal that Joseph and Nicodemus were
wealthy men who travelled far from Jerusalem, in the metals and grain trades respectively.  Because they were not always available to vote,
they had to give their proxies to the High Priest.
Nicodemus was a "RULER" of the people on the Sanhedrin, a man of
great wealth (he held a monopoly on grain in Jerusalem).  His friend
Joseph of Arimathea was in similar circumstances.  Undoubtedly, both
men often travelled together for months at a time.
 But why did they bury Jesus together?
 The Jewish law of burial left a man UNCLEAN for handling a dead body
--which would have prevented these men from eating the Passover, if we
accept John's gospel [Jn 18:28].  But the NEXT OF KIN were REQUIRED to
bury their family members.  That means both men were related to Jesus.
Catholic tradition makes Joseph the UNCLE of Jesus' mother, Mary, but
they also say he was YOUNGER than Mary.  The Church has evolved a view
of Mary as staying a virgin AFTER giving birth to Jesus, and this led it
to elevate Mary to a semi-divine status Rome feels is incompatible with
her having any siblings.  The idea is that her mother Anna had no other
children but Mary.  But the starting point of this odd logic is Rome's
belief in Mary remaining virgin AFTER giving birth to Jesus, an idea the
Bible goes to great lengths to refute:
The Bible declares, for example, that Mary lost her virginity at the
birth of Jesus [Lk 2:23; Is 66:9; Rev 12:4], had sex with her husband
[Mt 1:25], and was mother to many other children after Jesus [Mt 12:46-47;
13:55-57; 27:56,61; 28:1; Mk 6: 3-4; and many other similar passages]. To
maintain the myth of Mary keeping her virginity even after giving birth,
Rome decided in 1871 that Mary had herself had a miraculous birth without
original sin and without any siblings.  This meant Joseph of Arimathea
had to be pushed back another generation BEFORE Mary, even though he was
younger than Mary and was said to outlive her by 15 or 20 years.
This confusion vanishes in light of the Biblical verses cited above,
which removes the need to falsify Mary's family structure. Joseph was her
younger brother, uncle to Jesus.  When their father, Heli Joachim, died,
Joseph took over the family's seat on the Jewish Sanhedrin.  If this were
not so, Jesus could not be David's heir.  The "honored seat" Joseph held
on the Council was, of course, the seat of the House of David, the KING'S
SEAT.  Jesus sat on it at age 12 [Lk 2:41-51].  Joseph of Arimathea had
to adopt Jesus by Jewish law if he believed Jesus to be legitimate, for
Joseph was the male elder of the family and a brother had to adopt his
sister's unheired sons.
Had Joseph been an uncle of Mary the line of inheritance would have
deviated away from Jesus:  Mary would not have had it to pass down to
Jesus in the flesh.  Rome's efforts to deify Mary deny Jesus the throne
of David by natural inheritance, contrary to Scripture [Lk 1:31-33].
So Joseph of Arimathea was obligated to adopt Jesus.  The adoption
papers are quoted by Luke in chapter 3 of his gospel.  Rome admits the
genealogy there is that of Mary's side of the family, but ignores the
fact that the "Joseph" who is adopting Jesus is her brother by using
the bizarre argument that her husband acquired his wife's genealogy by
adopting Jesus--even though the whole point of adoption was the reverse
situation:  To give Jesus the adopting male's genealogy.  Had this male
been Joseph the "Carpenter" of the line of Jeconiah, whose descendents
were cursed from sitting upon the throne, Jesus would have been cut out
of the royal inheritance like all other men of Jeconiah's line.  Only
a BROTHER of Mary could adopt Jesus and keep Jesus in the royal line of
succession as the heir of David:
 "When Jesus was about to be thirty years of age, He became by
 custom [by adoption] the son of Joseph, the son of Heli..."
                                  [Lk 3:23, literal rendering]
All this means that Joseph of Arimathea had to be married to a woman
of very wealthy and high status.  Only such a woman would be suitable to
wed a man who held his position.  Nicodemus married his daughter Mary to
such a man.  Could Mary be Joseph's wife?
The gospels state that Jospeh of Arimathea [the city of Matthew: See
his genealogy] buried Jesus in his own UNUSED tomb in Jerusalem.  Joseph
had acquired it RECENTLY, for no one in his family had died and ever been
buried in it; yet the average age of death in those days was under thirty,
with many babies born dead.  This can only mean that Joseph had obtained
the site during his life and did not inherit it.
The common way such a tomb would come into a family was as part of a
DOWRY.  But if Joseph married Mary of BETHANY of the Mount of Olives,
then the dowry tomb would have been on the Mount of Olives and the site
of the Crucifixion must have been near Bethany at the summit of the
Mount.  This is in fact the case [See the link below to our discussion
of "THE CRUCIFIXION"].
Now we can see that Mary was a woman of great importance.  To gain a
tomb on the summit of Olivet was one of the most sought-after desires
of every Jewish person, but hardly anyone could achieve it.  Joseph was
given a piece of land when he married Mary that he would LITERALLY die
for.  But if he were to divorce her, it would revert to Nicodemus.
 
THE FAMILY LINE OF MARY MAGDALENE
This man Nicodemus was not only a member of the Sanhedrin, but a rabbi
and Pharisee and a ruler of the people.  All this makes him one of the
CHIEF SCRIBES. 
 
The house of Benjamin was given the right to keep the
written genealogies of the priests and kings to decide which persons were
entitled to inherit.  The Torah says Benjamin will "DIVIDE the SPOILS"--
that is, the inheritiances of Israel.
Benjamin was allotted six seats on the Council. 
 
One of these seats
was occupied by the chief elder of the tribe, the RULER of it.  John
calls Nicodemus a "RULER" and implies Nicodemus is the chief elder.
We know from 1 Chronicles 5 that the elders of Benjamin were expected
to live in Jerusalem, and that included Olivet. 
The grain monopoly he
held indicates that his family had PRE-EMINENCE. 
 
To have absolute and
total control over the food supply of Jerusalem is hardly the kind of
thing a lesser line of Benjamin would inherit.  Nicodemus had to be of
the chief family--hence the HEAD of the tribe.
 But there's a catch.  In Benjamin, the WOMEN pass down the line of
inheritance.  Not Lazarus, but Nicodemus' elder daughter Mary was the
heir of the line.  Her son would sit on the Sanhedrin.
The term for the one who holds the authority is "PILLAR" (from the
idea that the family is a kind of building and a pillar is the most
prominent support of the edifice, hence the regal building block of a
family or institution).
In Hebrew, "pillar" is a "M'GD'L" or "magdal."  So the name "Mary,
the Magadalene" means
"Mary the Pillar (of her tribe)."  She was the
chief heir of the tribe of Benjamin.
 
To compare how this title was used in the Bible, the term used to
describe "The High Priest" in Hebrew was
"Ha-Kohen Ha-Gadol" or "The
Priest, The Pillar"--that is, he was the SUPREME Priest of the tribe,
the Chief elder of Levi
 Mary is called
 "Ma-Gadol-aH-eN" or "Great
Pillar Female One"
--that is, she was the
"Great Supreme Woman" of her
tribe:  Benjamin
.
 
Now we see her conferring her tribal honor on Jesus, making Jesus
the heir of Benjamin by adoption through her husband Joseph.  That had
the effect of giving Jesus the LEGAL RIGHT TO OFFICIALLY APPOINT what HE
called "SCRIBES of the Kingdom"--the writers of a NEW testament. 
 
But the
tribe of Benjamin could do more than keep written records that DESIGNATED
the Priest and King. 
 
It could ANOINT them.
When Mary brought out the "GENUINE Nard" and anointed Jesus, she was
declaring Jesus the OFFICIAL King.  Jesus observed that she in effect had
anointed Him for BURIAL.  Why? 
 
Because it was ILLEGAL and He now reeked
of contraband oil. 
 
The penalty was death under Rome's law.
 
But her anointing seems so informal, so loving and casual.  Or is it?
The gospels say she stood behind Him and poured it all out upon His
head and wiped the residue on His feet with her hair.  This act of hers
in STANDING BEHIND HIM AND POURING IT ON HIS HEAD is standard practice
for an OFFICIAL ROYAL ANOINTING.  Apparently she did not intend to pour
it all out, and when she did, she tried to wipe it up with her hair.
But Jesus chooses to emphasize her love and His forgiveness of her
prior sins "which were many."  What had Joseph of Arimathea's wife done
to be regarded as such a sinner?
John records the Sanhedrin bringing a woman to Jesus who was caught
"in the very act" of adultery.  Jesus is asked to JUDGE her.  Only her
husband, her father, and her eldest son had this right.  The reason is
that each had a LEGAL STAKE IN THE DOWRY.  If found guilty, a divorce
would cause the dowry to revert to her father's house.  Jesus as Mary's
male heir, albeit by adoption, had a legal basis for judging her.
When Jesus sets her "free," He does so conditionally.  "Where are they
who accuse you?"--meaning her father and husband.  No doubt they were off
on one of their merchant trips, which is why Mary had gotten into trouble
out of loneliness.  While Jesus had saved her life for the moment, she
was still under a kind of "house-arrest" pending the return of Joseph and
Nicodemus.  A woman left alone for months or even years at a time could
easily fall into adultery.  And could be forgiven for her weakness.
However, NO CHILD SHE BORE AFTER THIS COULD INHERIT...and certainly
not the throne of David!  Orthodox rabbis still hold to this rule.
 Even if Mary were the wife of Jesus as some claim, it would be of no
inheritance value to her descendents.  All her subsequent offspring in
the aftermath of adultery would be legally bastards with NO CLAIM ON
ANY INHERITANCE OR ROYAL THRONE.
Therefore, all those pretenders who are now claiming to be the heirs
of David through Jesus and Mary Magdalene are claiming an inheritance
that cannot exist.  Most of them cite an "heir" produced long after
Mary's sexual escapades (if she had any; being caught public embrace of
one not your spouse could in some cases be "in the act" of adultery).
WAS JESUS MARRIED AT ALL?
Aside from the obvious fact that much of the New Testament is about
Jesus as the Bridegroom of the Church, the Bride of Christ, how could
Jesus have married?  No father would have married his daughter to this
man whom the general public believed was a result of fornication with an
UNKNOWN FATHER. (The Talmud later suggested the father of Jesus might be
a gentile Roman soldier, ie an uncircumcised rapist.) Even Mary's about-
to-be husband Joseph was ready to divorce her over this issue [Mt 1:19].
 Even if Joseph had tried to marry Jesus off under his own name, it was
a problem, for his line carried the CURSE of Jeconiah.  In fact, it is a
well-documented tradition that his own first-born, James, never married.
This hardly boded well for Jesus.  James would not have made a decision
to be celebate at 13 because of some Christian piety, for James did not
yet believe in Jesus as the Christ.  James simply could not be married
because of the family curse, which he carried as first-born of Joseph.
Even if James had not inherited that curse, all Mary's children were also
tainted by her first supposed "illigitimate" birth.
 (Joseph's marriage to Mary was by special circumstance as we discuss
in our article about him [coming soon].  Briefly, Joseph innocently put
Mary's father in a position where he had to let her marry Joseph.)
So Jesus could not be married until He was adopted by a man without
the curse, namely Joseph of Arimathea, His wealthy and powerful uncle.
One could argue that Jesus waited until He was thirty to be adopted and
get married.  But that is exactly what the New Testament says: Jesus was
going around the land "wooing" a Bride, the Church.
The marriage feast at Cana is sometimes said to be His marriage to
Mary Magdalene...or somebody.  The "bridegroom" is not named; so the now
critics want to assert he is Jesus because His family is invited to the
wedding.  But John says Jesus was "INVITED" to the wedding.  However, a groom is never invited to his own wedding! 
 
He and the bride don't get
invitations to their wedding; they or their parents are the ones who do
the inviting. [Jn 2:2]
If Jesus is the bridegroom, why is He unconcerned that the guests to
His own wedding have no wine?  Why does His mother have to urge Him to
act against His inclination?  Why does Mary have to tell the staff to
obey the bridegroom? 
 
This makes no sense at all.  On the other hand, if Jesus is merely a GUEST, it makes perfect sense. 
 
 It could be one of His
younger sisters getting married, which would explain why the staff obeys
Mary, but must be instructed to obey Jesus.
WAS JESUS A RABBI WHO HAD TO BE MARRIED?
 
This absurd argument flies in the face of the express statement of
John's gospel that Jesus had "NEVER studied" under the rabbis or the
scribes in Jerusalem or apparently ANYWHERE:
 "And the Jews marveled, saying, 'How does this man have learning, having NEVER studied?'" [Jn 7:15]
Jesus TAUGHT, but He had no formal training, and was therefore NOT an OFFICIAL rabbi, who had to be married under the rules. 
 
Jesus was a
"small r" rabbi, an unofficial teacher, as John states.  Being unable to marry, Jesus could not qualify to study under the official rules.
All throughjout the gospels we are told how the scribes and Pharisees, the OFFICIAL teachers of the people, were jealous of Jesus, spied on
His teaching, tried to discredit Him, etc.  If Jesus had credentials from them, they would have boasted of Him. 
 
But He did not.  Jesus was
a COMPETITOR, and outsider, someone they had NOT taught, a teacher who had his learning directly from God, Nicodemus concluded.
 
Which brings us to how Nicodemus could find Jesus so easily at night in that house at Bethany, coming to Him "secretly" by night.
 
 He simply walked down the hall and knocked on His door.  After all, it was his own house, and Jesus was his grandson by adoption.
 
And that explains why Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea were the two men who were required by law to bury Jesus:  His adoptive father and
maternal uncle and His adoptive grandfather, respectively. 
It also
explains why Mary Magdalene, his adoptive mother, was at the tomb with
His natural mother Mary and her sister Salome.
As for the business about Mary calling Jesus "rabboni"--it was her
proper title for the heir of the family and the person who had saved
her life and was now sort of her "parole officer" and responsible for
her behavior in the future. 
 
 He had become a legal guardian over her,
because her continued life was His responsibility, having let her go
after her capital crime, under the Law of Moses, of adultery.
We see Jesus' authority over Mary at Lazarus' funeral. 
 
As the true
elder of her family, Mary was sitting in official mourning in the house
to receive visitors, as Jewish custom required (and still does).  She
could only leave the house under very special circumstances.  It would be like calling the bride away from the midst of her wedding to give her a message. 
 
But because Jesus was acting as a kind of warden over her--she was a convicted felon on parole in the eyes of the law--Mary
had to obey Jesus who held custody over her, in effect. 
 
 
 It had not a thing to do with her being His wife, as many mistakenly assume. 
 
Why
would she have been under some strange obligation to remain inside her
BROTHER'S house as a wifely duty? 
 
There is no such custom.  She was
the chief official mourner, a role that fell to the eldest woman. 
 
It had nothing to do with marriage or Jesus.
 
SUMMARY
 
All the "evidence" about Jesus and Mary Magdalene being married to
each other collapses when examined closely. 
 
The ulterior motives of a
few royal lines in Europe in asserting an inheritance back to Jesus
from Mary Magdalene have produced a slew of specious arguments which
are flatly contradicted by the very Bible passages they cite and by the
known practices and customs of the Jewish people at the time.
Jesus has a Bride to which He has pledged to come back.  It is the
Bride of Christ, the true spiritual body of believers.  The whole idea
is that the New Covenant is a spiritual MARRIAGE covenant with this
Bride, not a sexual union. 
 
While she may well be among the saints He
will raise up and "wed" at His coming, Mary is but one of the many in
the Church. 
 
If she were His carnal wife, His future "wedding feast"
would be confused and distorted,  Indeed, it would have been ADULTERY,
in a technical legal sense, for Jesus to have been seeking to create a
marriage covenant with the Church while married to Mary.  He would have been unfaithful to her. 
 
The whole idea would defile the entire basis
of the New Covenant relationship:  That Jesus is an UNMARRIED King who
is "betrothed" to the Church [Ephesians 5:21-33].
 
If Mary Magdalene is Jesus' adoptive mother, a thousand mysteries are
resolved. 

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - PICS - SOUL MATES

But if she is His wife, a thousand conflicts are created.

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - PICS - DIVINE COUPLE

 

 

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - EUROPA AND THE SEA BULL

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - EUROPA & THE SEABULL

Europa and the Sea Bull:
The Missing Link Between Phoenicia and France
By now, most readers should be familiar with the story of the Quinotaur, the mythical sea beast (part-bull, part-fish) that sired the race of Merovingian kings. But what has heretofore served as the beginning of the Merovingian saga is only part of the story. For the first part of the drama, we must go back to the ancient sea peoples of Phoenicia.

One of the strange legends of the Phoenicians involves the disappearance of Europa, the daughter of Canaan 1, the son of Poseidon. In some versions of the story, Europa was a princess, in others, the daughter of a god. She was said to be exceedingly beautiful, and her father's favorite. One day a servant came into the palace and told Europa that a beautiful white bull had appeared mysteriously on the beach. Intrigued, Europa went down to see the unusual creature. The bull, we are told, was indeed very beautiful, and seemingly very tame and playful. Europa wrapped garlands of flowers around its horns, and frolicked beside it. Encouraged by the creature's gentleness, she climbed atop it, and it ran about the beach to her utter delight. Then, unexpectedly, the creature turned and ran toward the ocean. The servant ran after the two, but it was no use. The bull had run into the waves and had begun to swim out to sea. Europa's handmaiden could only watch in helpless horror as the vision of the princess disappeared off into the distance.

This same story is told by the Greeks, the only exception being that the figure of Canaan is replaced by Aegeanor (from whose name we derive the Aegean Sea.) Perhaps the oddest aspect of this unusual story is that historical chroniclers deny that its purely mythological. Herodotus says that the story of Europa was based on a real incident, and that she was in fact an historical personage. Though such a claim is certainly bizarre, it seems no less bizarre than the fact that the continent of Europe should have taken its name from the central figure in such a story. Why name a continent after a girl associated with the notion of being taken away by a sea bull? It only starts to make sense when one considers the story of Europa in conjunction with the story of the Quinotaur. The tale that begins with the kidnapping of Europa is finished by the myth of the Quinotaur, who sires a race of sacred kings. For the Greeks (and many scholars), the sea bull of the Europa saga is seen as Zeus, the god traditionally associated with (or personified as) a bull. But bulls were also associated with many of the gods and kings of Phoenicia and Sumeria. In fact, the figure of the sea bull can be traced directly to the figure of Dagon, discussed elsewhere in this issue. An alternate name of Zeus was Dyaus, and an alternate name for Dagon was Daonos. So it would seem that Zeus and Dagon were different labels, applied by different cultures in different times to essentially the same figure. This of course is a very common process, and one that is encountered repeatedly in even the most superficial comparisons of one mythology to another. The kings of the most ancient cultures in time become their gods, and repeatedly the gods of dominant cultures become the gods of less dominant ones. So it is that the sea bull of Europa is one in the same as the Quinotaur of the Merovingian kings, and as the Quinotaur was the legendary father of European monarchs, the mother was Europa, after whom they named their continent.




This depiction of a "Quinotaur" was drawn by Sir Francis Dashwood, notorious founder of the Hellfire Club, and co-conspirator of Arch-Mason, Ben Franklin. It is believed to have been drawn on Dashwood's first trip to Italy, and based on a statue from the palace of Nero.

1 Canaan was a historical figure after whom the Phoenician city-state was named.



[ RETURN TO INDEX ]

SEE LINK FOR EUROPA AND THE SEA BULL

 

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OF LIFE

The Merovingians (or Merovings) were a Salian Frankish dynasty that came to rule the Franks in a region largely corresponding to ancient Gaul from the mid fifth to the mid eighth century. Their politics involved frequent civil warfare between branches of the family. During the final century of the Merovingian rule, the dynasty was increasingly pushed into a ceremonial role. The Merovingian rule was ended by a palace coup in 751 when Pippin the Short formally deposed Childeric III, beginning the Carolingian monarchy.

They were sometimes referred to as the "long-haired kings" (Latin reges criniti) by contemporaries, for their symbolically unshorn hair (traditionally the tribal leader of the Franks wore his hair long, as distinct from the Romans and the tonsured clergy). The term Merovingian comes from medieval Latin Merovingi or Merohingi ("sons of Merovech"), an alteration of an unattested Old West Low Franconian form, akin to their dynasty's Old English name Merewīowing[1], with the final -ing being a typical patronymic suffix.

Origins

The Merovingian dynasty owes its name to the semi-legendary Merovech, (Latinised as Meroveus or Merovius), leader of the Salian Franks, and emerges into wider history with the victories of his son Childeric I (reigned c.457 – 481) against the Visigoths, Saxons, and Alemanni. Childeric's son Clovis I went on to unite most of Gaul north of the Loire under his control around 486, when he defeated Syagrius, the Roman ruler in those parts. He won the Battle of Tolbiac against the Alemanni in 496, at which time, according to Gregory of Tours, Clovis adopted his wife's Nicene Christian faith. He subsequently went on to decisively defeat the Visigothic kingdom of Toulouse in the Battle of Vouillé in 507. After Clovis' death, his kingdom was partitioned among his four sons, and over the next century this tradition of partition would continue.

Even when multiple Merovingian kings ruled, the kingdom — not unlike the late Roman Empire — was conceived of as a single entity ruled collectively by several kings (in their own realms) and a turn of events could result in the reunification of the whole kingdom under a single ruler.

 Leadership among the early Merovingians was probably based on mythical descent and alleged divine patronage, expressed in terms of continued military success.

[edit] History

Upon Clovis' death in 511, the Merovingian kingdom included all the Franks and all of Gaul but Burgundy. To the outside, the kingdom, even when divided under different kings, maintained unity and conquered Burgundy in 534. After the fall of the Ostrogoths, the Franks also conquered Provence. After this their borders with Italy (ruled by the Lombards since 568) and Visigothic Septimania remained fairly stable.[2]

Internally, the kingdom was divided among Clovis' sons and later among his grandsons and frequently saw war between the different kings, who quickly allied among themselves and against one another. The death of one king would create conflict between the surviving brothers and the deceased's sons, with differing outcomes. Later, conflicts were intensified by the personal feud around Brunhilda.

***SHE IS THE SEEDS OF LIFE 

However, yearly warfare often did not constitute general devastation but took on an almost ritual character, with established 'rules' and norms.[3]

Eventually, Clotaire II in 613 reunited the entire Frankish realm under one ruler. Later divisions produced the stable units of Austrasia, Neustria, Burgundy and Aquitania.

The frequent wars had weakened royal power, while the aristocracy had made great gains and procured enormous concessions from the kings in return for their support. These concessions saw the very considerable power of the king parcelled out and retained by leading comites and duces (counts and dukes).

Very little is in fact known about the course of the seventh century due to a scarcity of sources, but Merovingians remained in power until the eighth century.

Clotaire's son Dagobert I (died 639), who had sent troops to Spain and pagan Slavic territories in the east, is commonly seen the last powerful Merovingian King.

Later kings are known as rois fainéants ("do-nothing kings"),

****THEY WERE FLAVUS'S AND THEY HAD TWO FATHER'S....

THEY SPERM SHELL OF ONE MAN AND THE SEMEN OF GOD ZEUS...

EUROPA AND THE SEA BULL

SEE LINK

 

THEY ARE MAGICAL BEINGS...THEIR MOTHER WAS THE GOD OF ALL GODS AND WHEN SHE THREW A COMMANDMENT THEY WOULD MAGICALLY GO WITH

THE SPIRIT

OF

THE SPEAR OF DESTINY

AND DO WHAT WAS RIGHT FOR THE MANY NOT THE FEW...

despite the fact only the last two kings did nothing.

 The kings, even strong-willed men like Dagobert II and Chilperic II, were not the main agents of political conflicts, leaving this role to their mayors of the palace, who increasingly substituted their own interest for their king's.

Many kings came to the throne at a young age and died in the prime of life, weakening royal power further.

The conflict between mayors was ended when the Austrasians under the Pepin the Middle triumphed in 687 in the Battle of Tertry.

After this, Pepin, though not a king, was the political ruler of the Frankish kingdom and left this position as a heritage to his sons.

It was now the sons of the mayor that divided the realm among each other under the rule of a single king.

After Pepin's long rule, his son Charles Martel

***HE HAD A SPEAR OF DESTINY

assumed power, fighting against nobles and his own stepmother.

His reputation for ruthlessness further undermined the king's position. During the last years of his life he even ruled without a king, though he did not assume royal dignity.

His sons Carloman and Pepin again appointed a Merovingian figure-head to stem rebellion on the kingdom's periphery, but in 751, Pepin finally displaced the last Merovingian and, with the support of the nobility and the blessing of Pope Zachary, himself assumed the title of a King of the Franks.

The deposed Merovingian was sent into a monastery, bereft of his symbolic long hair.

With Pepin, the Carolingians ruled the Franks as Kings.

Merovingian DKingdoms
Merovingian DKingdoms

Government and law

The Merovingian king was the master of the booty of war, both movable and in lands and their folk, and he was in charge of the redistribution of conquered wealth among his followers, though these powers were not absolute.

"When he died his property was divided equally among his heirs as though it were private property: the kingdom was a form of patrimony" (Rouche 1987 p 420).

Some scholars have attributed this to the Merovingians lacking a sense of res publica, but other historians have criticized this view as an oversimplification.

The kings appointed magnates to be comites (counts), charging them with defense, administration, and the judgement of disputes.

***THESE ARE JOBS FILLED BY GODS...

This happened against the backdrop of a newly isolated Europe without its Roman systems of taxation and bureaucracy, the Franks having taken over administration as they gradually penetrated into the thoroughly Romanised west and south of Gaul.

The counts had to provide armies, enlisting their milites and endowing them with land in return.

These armies were subject to the king's call for military support. There were annual national assemblies of the nobles of the realm and their armed retainers which decided major policies of warmaking.

The army also acclaimed new kings by raising them on its shields in a continuance of ancient practice which made the king the leader of the warrior-band.

 Furthermore, the king was expected to support himself with the products of his private domain (royal demesne), which was called the fisc.

This system developed in time into feudalism, and expectations of royal self-sufficiency lasted until the Hundred Years' War.

Trade declined with the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, and agricultural estates were mostly self-sufficient.

The remaining international trade was dominated by Middle Eastern merchants.

Merovingian law was not universal law equally applicable to all; it was applied to each man according to his origin: Ripuarian Franks were subject to their own Lex Ripuaria, codified at a late date (Beyerle and Buchner 1954), while the so-called Lex Salica (Salic Law) of the Salian clans, first tentatively codified in 511 (Rouche 1987 p 423) was invoked under medieval exigencies as late as the Valois era.

****MEDIEVAL EXIGENCIES = GODS

In this the Franks lagged behind the Burgundians and the Visigoths, that they had no universal Roman-based law.

In Merovingian times, law remained in the rote memorisation of rachimburgs, who memorised all the precedents on which it was based, for Merovingian law did not admit of the concept of creating new law, only of maintaining tradition.

Nor did its Germanic traditions offer any code of civil law required of urbanised society, such as Justinian

*****THIS IS LISA GONZALES SON JUSTIN...SHE WAS TRYING TO BE ME EUROPA BUT MESSED UP EVERYTHING...SHE HAD HER SONS BABY...SHE ALSO TOOK THE SHELL OF THE SPERM AND FILLED IT WITH HER SONS SPERM AND HAD HER SON'S CHILD AND PASTED HIM OFF AS ROYAL....HE WAS COMPLETELY DEFORMED BUT SHE THOUGHT HE HAD MAGICAL POWERS AND USED THE SPEAR OF DESTINY TO THROW HIM....

caused to be assembled and promulgated in the Byzantine Empire.

The few surviving Merovingian edicts are almost entirely concerned with settling divisions of estates among heirs.

Religion and culture

Merovingian culture was so thoroughly imbued with religion that Yitzhak Hen found that a presentation of Merovingian popular culture was essentially synonymous with Merovingian religion, which he presented through written texts.[4]

Merovingian culture certainly witnessed an extensive proliferation of saints.

****SAINTS WERE NAMED BY GODS OF ALL GODS...

Christianity was brought to the Franks by monks.

***CHRISTIANITY HAD DIED BECAUSE THEY KNEW ABOUT THE SEEDS AND ABOUT MAGIC AND THERE WAS NO NEED FOR CHRISTIANITY...

The most famous of these missionaries is St. Columbanus, an Irish monk who enjoyed great influence with Queen Balthild.

Merovingian kings and queens used the newly forming ecclesiastical power structure to their advantage.

***THEY HAD THE POWER TO MOVE THINGS WITH THEIR MINDS...

Monasteries and episcopal seats were shrewdly awarded to elites who supported the dynasty.

***THEY HAD TO SIT ON THEIR HABD FOR HOURS AND WAIT FOR SOMETHING TO EAT...THIS SOUNDS LIKE SOMETHING THE MOTHER'S OF DARKNESS WOULD DO FOR TRAINING TO GO UP AGAINST ME SOPHIA OF WISDOM III...

Extensive parcels of land were donated to monasteries to exempt those lands from royal taxation and to preserve them within the family.

The family would maintain its dominance over the monastery by appointing family members as abbots.

Extra sons and daughters who could not be married off were sent to monasteries so that they would not threaten the inheritance of older children.

***LISA GONZALES DID THIS TO MY CHILDREN BACK THEN...

This pragmatic use of monasteries ensured close ties between elites and monastic properties.

***THEY WOULD TAKE ALL THE MONEY THEY HAD AND PUT INTO THE MONASTARY AND THEY THEY WOULD SELL THE LAND AND BECOME LAND BARRONS...

Numerous Merovingians who served as bishops and abbots, or who generously funded abbeys and monasteries, were rewarded with sainthood.

****WHEN THEY REALIZED WHO MY CHILDREN WERE THEY AWARDED THEM THEIR SAINTHOODS.

The outstanding handful of Frankish saints who were not of the Merovingian kinship nor the family alliances that provided Merovingian counts and dukes, deserve a closer inspection for that fact alone: like Gregory of Tours, they were almost without exception from the Gallo-Roman aristocracy in regions south and west of Merovingian control.

***THEY WOULD BUY AND SELL LAND ALL THE TIME AND NEVER STOPPED AND THEY MADE A MESS OF THE AREAS THEY TOUCHED...THEN THEY WOULD SELL THEM BACK FOR A DOLLAR AND THIS IS HOW THEY AQUIRED A LOT OF LAND...AND THEN THEY WOULD SELL IT BACK AGAIN FOR A DOLLAR AND KEPT GOING ON AND ON AND THEY NEVER EVER STOPPED EVEN TO THIS DAY...

The most characteristic form of Merovingian literature is represented by the Lives of the saints.

***I WAS ONE OF THE SAINTS THAT THEY TRIED TO PUT UNDER....BUT I AM BACK WITH MY CHILDREN AND ST. PRIX AKA JOHN F. KENNEDY, JR.

Merovingian hagiography did not set out to reconstruct a biography in the Roman or the modern sense, but to attract and hold popular devotion by the formulas of elaborate literary exercises, through which the Frankish Church channeled popular piety within orthodox channels, defined the nature of sanctity and retained some control over the posthumous cults that developed spontaneously at burial sites, where the life-force of the saint lingered, to do good for the votary.[5]

***THIS IS THE PLACE WHERE THEY PUT PEOPLE WHO WON'T BEHAVE AND LEAVE THEM TO DIE..AND THEN THEY PUT THEM BACK ON THE STREET FOR THEIR OUR GOOD AND LET THEM WORK OFF THEIR DEBTS...

The vitae et miracula, for impressive miracles were an essential element of Merovingian hagiography, were read aloud on saints’ feast days.

***ON THIS DAY WE WOULD READ ALOUD WHAT WE HAD PLANNED FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR AND THE NEXT YEAR AFTER THAT..AND THEY WERE ALWAYS BEAUTIFUL AND WELL DONE...

Many Merovingian saints, and the majority of female saints, were local ones, venerated only within strictly circumscribed regions; their cults were revived in the High Middle Ages, when the population of women in religious orders increased enormously.

 Judith Oliver noted five Merovingian female saints in the diocese of Liège who appeared in a long list of saints in a late thirteenth-century psalter-hours.[6]

***THEY WERE ALWAYS ON THE SAINTS LIST AND I NEVER WAS...THAT'S OKAY I WAS GODS OF ALL GODS ANYWAY...

The characteristics they shared with many Merovingian female saints may be mentioned: Regenulfa of Incourt, a seventh-century virgin in French-speaking Brabant of the ancestral line of the dukes of Brabant fled from a proposal of marriage to live isolated in the forest, where a curative spring sprang forth at her touch; Ermelindis of Meldert, a sixth-century virgin descended from Pepin I, inhabited several isolated villas;

Begga of Andenne,the mother of Pepin II, founded seven churches in Andenne during her widowhood;

***THIS WAS ME BUT ONE OF THE MOTHER'S OF DARKNESS TOOK OVER AND EVERYTHNG WENT TO HELL...

the purely legendary "Oda of Amay"

***THIS WAS PLACE WHERE THEY PUT THE PEOPLE THEY MADE REAL LITTLE LIKE JOSEPH EDWARD DUNCAN III TOLD ME....

THEY MAKE ME PUT THEM TO SLEEP AND IN THE MORNING I WOULD WAKE THE UP BY SAYING SOPHIA SOPHIA SOPHIA...THIS HAPPENED TO ME WHEN I WAS STUCK IN SAN FRANCISCO FOR RESURRECTION DAY...OCT 5 2004... 

was drawn into the Carolingian line by spurious genealogy in her thirteenth-century vita, which made her the mother of Arnulf, Bishop of Metz, but she has been identified with the historical Saint Chrodoara;[7] finally, the widely-venerated Gertrude of Nivelles, sister of Begga in the Carolingian ancestry, was abbess of a nunnery established by her mother. The vitae of six late Merovingian saints that illustrate the political history of the era have been translated and edited by Paul Fouracre and Richard A. Gerberding, and presented with Liber Historiae Francorum, to provide some historical context.[8]

***I HAD TO PERFORM ALL THE MAGIC BECAUSE THEY KEPT MESSING UP EVERYTHING...

 

[edit] Historiography and sources

"The story of the Franks, especially of the earlier Franks, is rich in fable but poor in history."
—Preface to Lewis Sergeant's The Franks

There exists a limited number of contemporary sources for the history of the Merovingian Franks, but those which have survived cover the entire period from Clovis' succession to Childeric's deposition. First and foremost among chroniclers of the age is the canonised bishop of Tours, Gregory of Tours. His Decem Libri Historiarum is a primary source for the reigns of the sons of Clotaire II and their descendants until Gregory's own death.

The next major source, far less organised than Gregory's work, is the Chronicle of Fredegar, begun by Fredegar but continued by unknown authors. It covers the period from 584 to 641, though its continuators, under Carolingian patronage, extended it to 768, after the close of the Merovingian era. It is the only primary narrative source for much of its period. The only other major contemporary source is the Liber Historiae Francorum, an anonymous adaptation of Gregory's work apparently ignorant of Fredegar's chronicle: its author(s) ends with a reference to Theuderic IV's sixth year, which would be 727. It was widely read; though it was undoubtedly a piece of Arnulfing work, and its biases cause it to mislead (for instance, concerning the two decades between the controversies surrounding mayors Grimoald the Elder and Ebroin: 652-673).

Aside from these chronicles, the only surviving reservoires of historiography are letters, capitularies, and the like. Clerical men such as Gregory and Sulpitius the Pious were letter-writers, though relatively few letters survive. Edicts, grants, and judicial decisions survive, as well as the famous Lex Salica, mentioned above. From the reign of Clotaire II and Dagobert I survive many examples of the royal position as the supreme justice and final arbiter. There also survive biographical Lives of saints of the period, for instance Saint Eligius and Leodegar, written soon after their subjects' deaths.

Finally, archaeological evidence cannot be ignored as a source for information, at the very least, on the modus vivendi of the Franks of the time. Among the greatest discoveries of lost objects was the 1653 accidental uncovering of Childeric I's tomb in the church of Saint Brice in Tournai. The grave objects included a golden bull's head and the famous golden insects (perhaps bees, cicadas, aphids, or flies) on which Napoleon modelled his coronation cloak. In 1957, the sepulchre of Clotaire I's second wife, Aregund, was discovered in Saint Denis Basilica in Paris. The funerary clothing and jewellery were reasonably well-preserved, giving us a look into the costume of the time.

[edit] Numismatics

Byzantine coinage was in use in Francia before Theudebert I began minting his own money at the start of his reign. He was the first to issue distinctly Merovingian coinage. The solidus and triens were minted in Francia between 534 and 679. The denarius (or denier) appeared later, in the name of Childeric II and various non-royals around 673–675. A Carolingian denarius replaced the Merovingian one, and the Frisian penning, in Gaul from 755 to the eleventh century.

Merovingian coins are on display at the Monnaie de Paris in Paris.

SEE LINK FOR MEROVINGIAN

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - THE SEEDS OF LIFE

Enter subhead content here

Enter content here

Enter supporting content here

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - CAROLINA KENNEDIA - SEAL - KISS FROM A ROSE 

SEE LINK FOR SEAL
http://ltjudgements2cmv.tripod.com/id13.html
 
SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - PICS - CAROLINE E. KENNEDY - CAROLINA KENNEDIA 
 
The mission of the Library of Congress and I is to make its resources available and useful to Congress and the American people and to sustain and preserve a
universal collection of knowledge
and
creativity for future generations.
The goal of the Library's National Digital Library Program is to offer broad public access to a wide range of historical and cultural documents as a contribution to education and lifelong learning.
The Library of Congress
presents these documents as part of the
record of the past.
These primary historical documents reflect the attitudes, perspectives, and beliefs of different times.
The Library of Congress
and
I do not endorse the views expressed in these collections, which may contain materials offensive to some readers.
SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - PICS - DISCOURSE

SEE LINK FOR DISCOURSEI FOUND THIS INFORMATION IN MY HISTORY FILE AND I DIDN'T LOOK IT UP SOMEONE ELSE WAS IN MY OFFICE ON MY COMPUTER AND DID IT OR THEY SWAPPED AND RAIDED MY COMPUTER DRIVE...I GUESS ONE OF THEM THOUGHT THEY COULD COVER MORE SUBJECTS THAN ME...

http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/discourse/

SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - PRESENTATION 1

 

THE SOPHIA OF ALL THE SOPHIA'S OF WISDOMS

LIBRARY

OF
ST SOPHIA & JOHN OF WISDOM III -
 JUDGEMENTS & NOTES -
SUBJECT ORDER -
PRESENTATION 5